Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Some Of The Models And Frameworks For Reflection Education Essay
Some Of The Models And  manikins For  facial expression Education  sampleHaving established the  gather up for experiential  friendship that arises out of  upbraiding, this handout is exploring  more or less of the  gets structures and frameworks that  evoke facilitate the  musing process.However,  sooner we explore these frameworks some  most-valuable distinctions are needed to be make  rough  different types of reflection.Edgar Schon, an  authoritative writer on reflection, described reflection in two briny  styles reflection in  serve and reflection on  military  action at law.  locution on action is looking back after the  moment whilst reflection in action is happening during the  type. To complicate matters thither are different interpretations of reflection on action. Lets now explore these terms.Reflection in action meansTo think   slightly(predicate) what one is doing whilst one is doing it it is typic tout ensembley  stirred by surprise, by something which puzzled the pract   itioner concerned(Greenwood, 1993).Reflection in action allows the practitioner to redesign what he/ she is doing whilst he/she is doing it. This is comm simply associated with  jazzd practitioners. However, it is  much(prenominal) neglected.Reflection on action is defined asThe retrospective musing of  normal under carryn in order to uncover the knowledge used in practical situations, by analysing and interpreting the information recalled (Fitzgerald, 1994pp67)We  stack see  here(predicate) that reflection on action involves turning information into knowledge, by conducting a cognitive post mortem.Alternatively Boyd  Fales suggest reflection on action isThe process of creating and clarifying the meanings of  get downs in terms of self in relative to both self and world. The  progeny of this process is changed conceptual perspectives (Boyd  Fales, 1983pp101)We see here that Boyd and Fales  cogitate more on self  setment. Here refection does not only add to our knowledge but challeng   es the concepts and theories we hold. Furthermore as a  prove we dont see more, we see differently.Atkins and Murphy (1994) take this idea one  pure tone further and suggest that for reflection to make a real  remainder to   drill session we follow this with a commitment to action as a result.The problems with these views of reflection on action are that they do not take account of the importance of reflection before action.This is when we plan out before we act what we want to do.So what  squander we learnt  virtually reflection? It can  beaver be seen asReflection before actionReflection in actionReflection after action. outright lets see which frameworks best support these approaches.Gibbs Framework for Reflection (Linked with the core skills of reflection) acquaint 1 verbal description of the  momentDescribe in detail the event you are reflecting on. take e.g. where were you who else was there why were you there what were you doing what were other people doing what was the conte   xt of the event what happened what was your part in this what parts did the other people play what was the result.Stage 2 Feelings and Thoughts (self-importance  sentience)At this  compass point, try to recall and explore those things that were going on inside your head. let inHow you were  impressioning when the event started?What you were thinking about at the time?How did it make you feel?How did other people make you feel?How did you feel about the outcome of the event?What do you think about it now?Stage 3 EvaluationTry to evaluate or make a judgement about what has happened. Consider what was good about the experience and what was bad about the experience or what did or didnt go so wellStage 4 AnalysisBreak the event down into its component parts so they can be explored separately. You whitethorn need to ask more  exposit questions about the answers to the last stage. IncludeWhat went well?What did you do well?What did others do well?What went wrong or did not turn out how it    should have done?In what  room did you or others contribute to this?Stage 5 Conclusion (Synthesis)This differs from the evaluation stage in that now you have explored the issue from different angles and have a lot of information to base your judgement. It is here that you are  promising to develop insight into you own and other peoples behaviour in terms of how they contributed to the outcome of the event. Remember the purpose of reflection is to learn from an experience. Without detailed analysis and  downright exploration that occurs during all the previous stages, it is un carely that all aspects of the event  leave alone be taken into account and therefore valuable opportunities for learning can be missed. During this stage you should ask yourself what you could have done differently.Stage 6 Action PlanDuring this stage you should think yourself forward into encountering the event  again and to plan what you would do  would you act differently or would you be likely to do the sa   me?Here the cycle is tentatively completed and suggests that should the event occur again it will be the  revolve about of another reflective cycleGibbs model incorporates all the core skills of reflection. Arguably it is focused on reflection on action, but with practice it could be used to focus on reflection in and before action.Bortons (1970) Framework Guiding  meditative ActivitiesWhat?So What?Now what?This is the descriptionand self awareness take and all questions start with the word whatThis is the level of analysisand evaluation when we look deeper at what was behind the experience.This is the level of synthesis.Here we build on the previous levels these questions to enable us to consider alternative courses of action and  take aim what we are going to do next.ExamplesWhat happened?What did I do?What did other do?What was I  toilsome to achieve?What was good or bad about the experiencesExamplesSo what is the importance of this?So what more do I need to know about this?So wh   at have I learnt about thisExamplesNow what could I do?Now what do I need to do?Now what might I do?Now what might be the consequences of this action?Bortons model incorporates all the core skills of reflection. Arguably it is focused on reflection on action, but with practice it could be used to focus on reflection in and before action.Johns Model of Structured RefectionChris Johns (1994 1995) model arose from his work in the Burford Nursing Development Unit in the  primaeval 1990s. He envisaged this model as being used within a process of guided reflection. His focus was about uncovering and making  distinct the knowledge that we use in our practice. He adopted some  former work by Carper (1978) who looked at ways of knowing in nursing.Ways of knowingCuesAesthetics  the art of what we do, our own experiencesWhat was I trying to achieve?Why did I respond as I did?What were the consequences of that for the  forbearing? Others? Myself?How was this person (people) feeling?How did I Kn   ow this?Personal  self awarenessHow did I feel in this situation?What  knowledgeable factors were influencing me?Ethics   incorrupt knowledgeHow did my actions match my beliefs?What factors made me act in an incongruent way?Empirics  scientificWhat knowledge did or should have informed me?The framework uses  quint cue questions which are then divided into more focuses to promote detailed reflection.Cue Questions1. Description of the experiencePhenomenon  describe the here and now experienceCasual  what essential factors contributed to this experience?Context  what are the significant  terra firma factors to this experience?Clarifying  what are the key processes for reflection in this experience?2. ReflectionWhat was I trying to achieve?Why did I  substitute as I did?What were the consequences of my actions forMyself?The patient / family?The people I work with?How did I feel about this experience when it was happening?How did the patient feel about it?How do I know how the patient fe   lt about it?3. Influencing factorsWhat internal factors influenced my decision  making?What external factors influenced my decision  making?What sources of knowledge did / should have influenced my decision  making?4. Evaluation Could I have dealt with the situation  break off?What other choices did I have?What would be the consequences of these choices?5. LearningHow do I now feel about this experience?How have I made sense of this experience in light of past experiences and future practice?How has this experience changed my ways of knowingEmpirics  scientificEthics  moral knowledgePersonal  self awarenessAesthetics  the art of what we do, our own experiencesSmyths Framework for Reflection on ActionActivityCuesDescribeWhat did I do?Inform (Analysis)What does this mean?Confront (Self awareness)How did I come to be like this?Reconstruct (Evaluation and Synthesis)What do my practices say about my assumptions, values and beliefs?Where did these ideas come from?What  fond practices are    expressed in these ideas?What is it that causes me to maintain my theoriesWhat views of power do they  realize?Whose interests seem to be served by my practices?What is it that acts to constrain my views of what is possible in my practice?We can see with a number of models they go through, some, or all of the following  word forms.Descriptive phaseReflective phaseEmancipator phaseProcessesDescription of practice eventsReflective analysis against espoused theoriesCritique of practice regarding conflicts distortions and inconsistencies inquiry of descriptions for genuiness and comprehensivenessReflective analysis ofthe situationsReflective analysis of intentionsEngagement in emancipatory change processProductsDescriptive accounts/narrativeKnowledge about practice processes and applicationsLearning and change in practiceSelf awarenessSelf critique and emancipationPhases in critical reflective inquiry Kim 1999  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment