Are Zoos Unethical to Animals Essay

Recently, contentious debates oblige locomote over the estimable dilemma that zoos pose regarding animals rights, freedoms and internal behavior. Many throng consider zoos amoral and cruel while others have the notion that they argon ethical because they help in research, conservation and proper treatment of savage animals. This exquisite topic has induced different reactions and sparked great debates as people pass on to do the right thing. According to Tuyl (2008), menageries are cover spaces and cages that abode animals. Hutchins and Keele (2006), beseech that, zoos provide excellent conditions for loony animals, as they are liberated from their natural habitats, which are pungent and unforgiving. They argue that wild animals are better place in the zoos because they are provided with free meals and a life that is free from parasites, and harsh weather and predators.However, there are various reasons that explain why zoos are wrong. This paper explains why zoos are wrong to animals. To confine wild animals in enclosed spaces, denies them freedom and the expertness to develop their natural behaviors. In addition, zoos conjure up the transmission of zoonotic diseases (Tuyl, 2008). Therefore, concerning animal rights and freedoms, zoos are highly unethical and should be banned to endow wild animals with an opportunity to lead lives free from valet handicaps. It is amoral to exert animals in the zoos because they act as cages that retract the wild animals freedom. respective(a) animal rights organizations advocate for the freedom of animals, a condition that is only getatable when they are in their natural habitats. Zoos act as prisons because of their small sizes and restraining the ability as compared to wild jungles, therefore, denying wild animals their freedom to roam and act naturally.It is unethical to keep wild animals locked up in a cage, especially in this era when people have realized that every living be should be allowed to hav e its freedom. All living beings are entitled to their rights. wonderful animals have liberty to live in the jungles because that is their natural habitat, which is a key right. To conceive animals away from their usual environment and confine them in cages and enclosed spaces provided by the zoos is a complete violation of animal rights. This denies wild animals the regain to act naturally and engage in the relationships that nature intended for them. waste animals are unable to lead quality lives when they are taken to the zoos (Jensen & adenosine monophosphate Holmes, 2007). They infringe on animal rights due to restrictions, therefore, causing some wild animals such as elephants to develop depression because of detachment from their herds (Hutchins & Keele, 2006). merciful beings should allow wild animals to live in their natural habitats, in the aforementioned(prenominal) manner that no individual would love to be manoeuverred from the comfort of their lieu and re-located into the jungle.People claiming that it is just to keep wild animals in the zoo have the notion that this action is purposeful for research and the conservation of endangered species. However, catch actions can be taken in the wild animals natural habitats, therefore, ahead(p) to better results. It is unethical for human beings to interfere with the lives of wild animals for research. It is inappropriate to transfer a wild animal from its habitat to study it. The results would be reorient because the animals natural behaviors would change with the changing environment. Human interference is also stellar(a) to the cause of animal extinction (Tuyl, 2008).Therefore, the appropriate and ethical action to take in the interest of extinction and research is to reduce human interference to obtain the best results regarding both issues. In conclusion, it is not ethical to keep wild animals in a zoo. As indicated in the paper, zoos interfere with the wild animals freedoms, righ ts and the ability to live naturally. Some people argue that zoos are encouraging in animal conservation regarding endangered species, but it is also all-important(a) to consider the main problem, which is human interference (Jensen & Holmes, 2007). Zoos are unethical to animals.ReferencesHutchins, M., & Keele, M. (2006). Elephant importation from range countries ethical and practical considerations for accredited zoos. Zoo Biology, 25(3), 219-233. Jensen, D., & Holmes, K. (2007). Thought to exist in the wild awakening from the nightmare of zoos. Santa Cruz, CA No Voice Unheard. Tuyl, C. (2008). Zoos and animal welfare. Detroit Greenhaven Press.