The image of fish Essay Example for Free

The image of fish EssayKevin Roberts uses the image of fish in both his poems Skating Down Tr tabu and A lean Too Big to explore existential hurt in the point of view of the water creatures. In both poems, the fishes were presented as biography in slightly kind of prison the trout in Skating Down was walled beneath internal-combustion engine, while the Arwanna at A Fish Too Big could barely move inside the enclosed aquarium. Although Roberts used fishes in both poems, he evoked different speculations intimately action drawing from the reactions of the fishes to their situations. In the first poem, the objective reality was that the trout were living beneath the ice, and were safe against huntsmans who wish to make them dinner. The trout do not know that the ice functions like a shield to protect them from danger. Down there, nothing pot touch them as long as the ice stands between the shadows and danger (lines 13-18). But the trout are easily scared, and their fears g et the better of them driven by forms notwithstanding the fish makes substance until in panic at the hiss and whirof the steel blades it runs defeats itself they end up driving the nails to their own coffin, prized catch to the hunters. If only the trout had more faith in their own environment where they had managed to stand for so long, then perhaps they would still be alive. They created their own deaths by giving in to their fears. On the other hand, the Arwanna in A Fish Too Big is opposite. The Arwanna was depicted as too largish for its aquarium that it has no room to move anymore, a prisoner behind ice rink.The Arwanna The Arwanna could easily leap out or break its aquarium if it wanted to because of its sheer size, exactly the Arwanna accepts it fate and stays calm. If it chooses to move about and free itself from its cage, then the Arwanna will undoubtedly die. And so the Arwanna chooses to stay still, as the Thais say in lines 31-32 what can you do / without fate c hance luck. It seems that the Arwanna has indeed accepted its situation, and have given up. What it needed was fate, or chance, or luck, to be able to get out of the situation.It sends an indirect statement saying that there is very teensy we can do about what happens to us that in the end, death is a looming inevitability, and what one can do is live the life given to it before death comes knocking at ones door. The finale three lines And what can the fish or I do / about our own shrinking / glass cage of flesh? sums up the existential anguish the speaker is experiencing. The speaker was watching the Arwanna the whole sequence but was subconsciously relating himself to the fish, finding himself trapped with nowhere to go and nothing to do but cargo area for impending death stuck in his situation.However, there is a sense of peace as compared to the first poem. For in the first poem, the trout faced no real danger but because of its restlessness and fear ended up dead. But its f ear is not without reason they were being hunted. In contrast, although there was no aggressive hunter about to kill the Arwanna, the fish faced a terrible situation it was caged and could not move, but if it act to it will face death outside its prison.The main difference between the two was that the Arwanna has accepted its life and lived a life of calm, whereas the trout lived a life of fear. Roberts used the image of fish in both his poems, but he to different effects. The trout lived in an environment where they were hunted, but could easily escape its hunters by staying deep in the water. The Arwanna had no choice but to breathe inside its cell, or choose death. Even so, the trout who had more liberty than the Arwanna dived in to its demise because of its recklessness, because it let fear consume it.